QUESTIONNAIRE

FREEDOM FROM COVERT HARASSMENT AND SURVEILLANCE

Printer-friendly version:  www.freedomfchs.com/attyquestionnaire.pdf

The information requested in this survey is being gathered in anticipation of litigation involving harassment group activities, organized stalking and electromagnetic and other weapons torture by government agencies and contractors (“government abuse”). If you are represented by an attorney in a similar matter, please do not complete this form; instead, you should provide your counsel’s name and contact information to FFCHS if you wish your attorney to be contacted. THANK YOU FOR RETURNING THIS COMPLETED FORM WITHIN ONE WEEK AS WE PROCEED IN EVALUATING THE NUMEROUS INSTANCES OF GOVERNMENT ABUSE.

_______________________________________________________________________

YOUR NAME: __________________________________________________________

ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________

CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: ________________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBERS: ________________________________________________

EMAIL ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________

1. Please briefly describe the circumstances of each instance of government abuse. [We understand the circumstances are detailed. We will seek additional details based on your description. Please state the most important facts, including the dates, city, state, specific address or nearest street intersections, and the conduct by the agents or contractors.]

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

2. If known, please state the names of the involved government agencies, individual agents or private contractors, in each instance above, and how you know each was involved: _______________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

3. Please provide the names and contact information for all witnesses to each instance above. __________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

4. Please describe all physical and psychological injuries you have suffered as a result of the government abuse. _____________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

5. Please state all your medical diagnoses, as determined by medical professionals, related to the government abuse. _____________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

6. Please provide the names and contact information for every doctor or medical provider who took seriously your reports of physical or psychological injuries as caused by the government abuse. [We will not attempt to gain private medical information without a signed release, but are seeking sympathetic experts. Please do not forward your medical records to us at this time due to privacy laws.]

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

7. Please state the names and contact information of all whistleblowers who have reported that their employer conducted the government abuse against citizens.

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

8. Please provide the names and contact information for all private investigators you have retained in these matters, only if they probably have evidence of government abuse.

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

9. Please provide the case information for all lawsuits you filed against a government agency or contractor based on government abuse as defined above, including names of plaintiffs and defendants, case number, jurisdiction (court and state or country), and resolution. _______________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

10. Please describe all physical evidence you have documenting government abuse, such as video and voice recordings and documents. __________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

WILSON LAW CENTER LLC

Jonathan O. Wilson, Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 1102

Morrison, Colorado 80465

(720) 219-8366

Fax: (303) 697-1189

Jon.wilson.law@hotmail.com

www.WilsonLawCenter.com

printer-friendly version:  www.freedomfchs.com/attorneylettertoleahy.pdf

March 31, 2008

Sen. Patrick Leahy

433 Russell Senate Office Bldg

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator:

I represent Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, an organization with several hundred members around the country and internationally who have reason to believe they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons. These targeted individuals suffer physical and psychological symptoms as a result of the remote manipulation. We seek your office’s assistance in initiating hearings and a fact-finding congressional inquiry into the government agencies and/or private companies that are targeting citizens. Many citizens are desperate to be freed from the disturbing, intrusive and oppressive targeting.

Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used against individuals, based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings, public releases by agencies, and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication. The weapons are believed to be based on electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves, lasers and other types of directed energy, and were characterized as “psychotronic” in Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s draft of House Resolution 2977, the Space Preservation Act of 2001. Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens without permission in the past; for example, the CIA’s human experimentation discussed in Orlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988), secretly administered lysergic acid diethylamide discussed in United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), and military chemical experimentation as discussed in Congressional Committee Report 103-97, 103d Congress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994). Lastly, the sheer numbers of people complaining of being targeted, including people with post-graduate degrees and a lifetime of achievements, and the similarities in symptoms tend to outweigh a dismissive response based on charges of anecdotal evidence or group paranoia.

Several plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs have filed suits in the past levying similar charges of directed weaponry, but, to my knowledge, all have been dismissed due to immunity and state secret defenses, and the lack of evidence of a direct link to agencies or companies. It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons when the perpetrators operate from remote, unseen locations and therefore the targeting can be dismissed as delusional. Given the wide scope of alleged targeting, there is a certain risk of sounding too conspiratorial, however, common denominators such as physical symptoms and medical reports, surveillance scenarios, harassment techniques, and more can be readily established.

Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance will gladly provide your office, and any legislator and investigator, reports from targeted individuals documenting instances of targeting, medical documentation, and recordings. This firm will provide research and investigation results upon request as well. We will diligently work with anyone willing to help. Please carefully consider convening hearings and an inquiry and collaborating with other legislators in an effort to uncover and stop this inhumane practice.

Very truly yours,

Jonathan Wilson

Attorney for Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance

WILSON LAW CENTER LLC

Jonathan O. Wilson, Attorney at Law

Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 1.13. Organization As Client

RULE 1.13. ORGANIZATION AS CLIENT

 (a) A lawyer employed or retained by an organization represents the organization acting through its duly authorized constituents.

 (b) If a lawyer for an organization knows that an officer, employee or other person associated with the organization is engaged in action, intends to act or refuses to act in a matter related to the representation that is a violation of a legal obligation to the organization, or a violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the organization, and is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization, the lawyer shall proceed as is reasonably necessary in the best interest of the organization. Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law.

 (c) Except as provided in paragraph (d), if

 (1) despite the lawyer’s efforts in accordance with paragraph (b) the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization insists upon or fails to address in a timely and appropriate manner an action, or a refusal to act, that is clearly a violation of law, and

 (2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the violation is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the organization, then the lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation whether or not Rule 1.6 permits such disclosure, but only if and to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent substantial injury to the organization.

 (d) Paragraph (c) shall not apply with respect to the information relating to a lawyer’s representation of an organization to investigate an alleged violation of law, or to defend the organization or an officer, employee or other constituent associated with the organization against a claim arising out of an alleged violation of law.

 (e) A lawyer who reasonably believes that he or she has been discharged because of the lawyer’s actions taken pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c), or who withdraws under circumstances that require or permit the lawyer to take action under either of those paragraphs, shall proceed as the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to assure that the organization’s highest authority is informed of the lawyer’s discharge or withdrawal.

 (f) In dealing with an organization’s directors, officers, employees, members, shareholders or other constituents, a lawyer shall explain the identity of the client when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the organization’s interests are adverse to those of the constituents with whom the lawyer is dealing.

 (g) A lawyer representing an organization may also represent any of its directors, officers, employees, members, shareholders or other constituents, subject to the provisions of Rule 1.7. If the organization’s consent to the dual representation is required by Rule 1.7, the consent shall be given by an appropriate official of the organization other than the individual who is to be represented, or by the shareholders.

COMMENT

The Entity as the Client

 [1] An organizational client is a legal entity, but it cannot act except through its officers, directors, employees, shareholders and other constituents. Officers, directors, employees and shareholders are the constituents of the corporate organizational client. The duties defined in this Comment apply equally to unincorporated associations. “Other constituents” as used in this Comment means the positions equivalent to officers, directors, employees and shareholders held by persons acting for organizational clients that are not corporations.

 [2] When one of the constituents of an organizational client communicates with the organization’s lawyer in that person’s organizational capacity, the communication is protected by Rule 1.6. Thus, by way of example, if an organizational client requests its lawyer to investigate allegations of wrongdoing, interviews made in the course of that investigation between the lawyer and the client’s employees or other constituents are covered by Rule 1.6. This does not mean, however, that constituents of an organizational client are the clients of the lawyer. The lawyer may not disclose to such constituents information relating to the representation except for disclosures explicitly or impliedly authorized by the organizational client in order to carry out the representation or as otherwise permitted by Rule 1.6.

 [3] When constituents of the organization make decisions for it, the decisions ordinarily must be accepted by the lawyer even if their utility or prudence is doubtful. Decisions concerning policy and operations, including ones entailing serious risk, are not as such in the lawyer’s province. Paragraph (19) makes clear, however, that, when the lawyer knows that the organization is likely to be substantially injured by action of an officer or other constituent that violates a legal obligation to the organization or is in violation of law that might be imputed to the organization, the lawyer must proceed as is reasonably necessary in the best interest of the organization. As defined in Rule 1.0(f), knowledge can be inferred from circumstances, and a lawyer cannot ignore the obvious.

 [4] In determining how to proceed under paragraph (b), the lawyer should give due consideration to the seriousness of the violation and its consequences, the responsibility in the organization and the apparent motivation of the person involved, the policies of the organization concerning such matters, and any other relevant considerations. Ordinarily, referral to a higher authority would be necessary. In some circumstances, however, it may be appropriate for the lawyer to ask the constituent to reconsider the matter; for example, if the circumstances involve a constituent’s innocent misunderstanding of law and subsequent acceptance of the lawyer’s advice, the lawyer may reasonably conclude that the best interest of the organization does not require that the matter be referred to higher authority. If a constituent persists in conduct contrary to the lawyer’s advice, it will be necessary for the lawyer to take steps to have the matter reviewed by a higher authority in the organization. If the matter is of sufficient seriousness and importance or urgency to the organization, referral to higher authority in the organization may be necessary even if the lawyer has not communicated with the constituent. Any measures taken should, to the extent practicable, minimize the risk of revealing information relating to the representation to persons outside the organization. Even in circumstances where a lawyer is not obligated by Rule 1.13 to proceed, a lawyer may bring to the attention of an organizational client, including its highest authority, matters that the lawyer reasonably believes to be of sufficient importance to warrant doing so in the best interest of the organization.

 [5] Paragraph (b) also makes clear that when it is reasonably necessary to enable the organization to address the matter in a timely and appropriate manner, the lawyer must refer the matter to higher authority, including, if warranted by the circumstances, the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization under applicable law. The organization’s highest authority to whom a matter may be referred ordinarily will be the board of directors or similar governing body. However, applicable law may prescribe that under certain conditions the highest authority reposes elsewhere, for example, in the independent directors of a corporation.

Relation to Other Rules

 [6] The authority and responsibility provided in this Rule are concurrent with the authority and responsibility provided in other Rules. In particular, this Rule does not limit or expand the lawyer’s responsibility under Rules 1.8, 1.16, 3.3 or 4.1. Paragraph (c) of this Rule supplements Rule 1.6(b) by providing an additional basis upon which the lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation, but does not modify, restrict, or limit the provisions of Rule 1.6(b)(1) – (7). Under paragraph (c) the lawyer may reveal such information only when the organization’s highest authority insists upon or fails to address threatened or ongoing action that is clearly a violation of law, and then only to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent reasonably certain substantial injury to the organization. It is not necessary that the lawyer’s services be used in furtherance of the violation, but it is required that the matter be related to the lawyer’s representation of the organization. If the lawyer’s services are being used by an organization to further a crime or fraud by the organization, Rules 1.6(b)(2), 1.6(b)(3) and 1.6(b)(4) may permit the lawyer to disclose confidential information. In such circumstances Rule 1.2(d) may also be applicable, in which event, withdrawal from the representation under Rule 1.16(a)(1) may be required.

 [7] Paragraph (d) makes clear that the authority of a lawyer to disclose information relating to a representation in circumstances described in paragraph (c) does not apply with respect to information relating to a lawyer’s engagement by an organization to investigate an alleged violation of law or to defend the organization or an officer, employee or other person associated with the organization against a client arising out of an alleged violation of law. This is necessary in order to enable organizational clients to enjoy the full benefits of legal counsel in conducting an investigation or defending against a claim.

 [8] A lawyer who reasonably believes that he or she has been discharged because of the lawyer’s actions taken pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c), or who withdraws in circumstances that require or permit the lawyer to take action under either of these paragraphs, must proceed as the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to assure that the organization’s highest authority is informed of the lawyer’s discharge or withdrawal.

Government Agency

 [9] The duty defined in this Rule applies to governmental organizations. Defining precisely the identity of the client and prescribing the resulting obligations of such lawyers may be more difficult in the government context and is a matter beyond the scope of these Rules. See Scope [18]. Although in some circumstances the client may be a specific agency, it may also be a branch of government, such as the executive branch, or the government as a whole. For example, if the action or failure to act involves the head of a bureau, either the department of which the bureau is a part or the relevant branch of government may be the client for purposes of this Rule. Moreover, in a matter involving the conduct of government officials, a government lawyer may have authority under applicable law to question such conduct more extensively than that of a lawyer for a private organization in similar circumstances. Thus, when the client is a governmental organization, a different balance may be appropriate between maintaining confidentiality and assuring that the wrongful act is prevented or rectified, for public business is involved. In addition, duties of lawyers employed by the government or lawyers in military service may be defined by statutes and regulation. This Rule does not limit that authority. See Scope.

Clarifying the Lawyer’s Role

 [10] There are times when the organization’s interest may be or become adverse to those of one or more of its constituents. In such circumstances the lawyer should advise any constituent, whose interest the lawyer finds adverse to that of the organization of the conflict or potential conflict of interest, that the lawyer cannot represent such constituent, and that such person may wish to obtain independent representation. Care must be taken to assure that the individual understands that, when there is such adversity of interest, the lawyer for the organization cannot provide legal representation for that constituent individual, and that discussions between the lawyer for the organization and the individual may not be privileged.

 [11] Whether such a warning should be given by the lawyer for the organization to any constituent individual may turn on the facts of each case.

Dual Representation

 [12] Paragraph (g) recognizes that a lawyer for an organization may also represent a principal officer or major shareholder.

Derivative Actions

 [13] Under generally prevailing law, the shareholders or members of a corporation may bring suit to compel the directors to perform their legal obligations in the supervision of the organization. Members of unincorporated associations have essentially the same right. Such an action may be brought nominally by the organization, but usually is, in fact, a legal controversy over management of the organization.

 [14] The question can arise whether counsel for the organization may defend such an action. The proposition that the organization is the lawyer’s client does not alone resolve the issue. Most derivative actions are a normal incident of an organization’s affairs, to be defended by the organization’s lawyer like any other suit. However, if the claim involves serious charges of wrongdoing by those in control of the organization, a conflict may arise between the lawyer’s duty to the organization and the lawyer’s relationship with the board. In those circumstances, Rule 1.7 governs who should represent the directors and the organization.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOIA REQUESTS

From legal counsel for FFCHS: Following is a Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act letter that everyone should send to each of the addresses below. Just cut and paste each address onto the top of the letter, enter the date you mail it, enter your date of birth and social security number where indicated, enter various spellings of your name under which records may be found, enter a maximum amount you are willing to pay for copies from each agency (often $15.00), enter the date and your name at the bottom and sign it. Keep a copy of each letter you send for your records.
 
In order to avoid a general denial by the agencies, you should rearrange the paragraphs in your form letter. Each person can send out the same rearranged letter to all of the agencies, but any two people's letters should look different. It is possible an agency could formulate a generic denial in response to every letter it receives that looks the same. We also do not want to alert the agencies of this large scale information-gathering campaign.
 
There are a few dozen agencies listed below, and you should send a separate letter to each agency only if you are willing to pay for the copies from each agency. Unfortunately, FFCHS cannot afford to cover costs with your FOIA letters. Sending out these letters is a way you can help further the legal cause. When you receive records that are relevant to group stalking, surveillance, criminal investigations, and other targeting, please forward copies to Wilson Law Center LLC, PO Box 1102, Morrison, CO 80465 or fax to 303-697-1189 or scan and email to jon.wilson.law@hotmail.com.  Also, if you receive a letter denying disclosure, please forward it to this firm, and we will consider whether to appeal the denial.
 
Thank you for your continuing assistance as we work to stop the targeting."
 
 
Thanks,
Jon Wilson
Attorney at Law
Wilson Law Center LLC
PO Box 1102, Morrison, CO 80465
720-219-8366
Fax: 303-697-1189
jon.wilson.law@hotmail.com
www.WilsonLawCenter.com

Request for documents- FOIA and the Privacy Act of 1974
Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to FOIA and the Privacy Act of 1974, I request your agency provide me copies of all documents in which my name is mentioned, including but not limited to any investigations of me; any interviews of others regarding me; any investigations of a group to which I belonged and am mentioned as a member; and any records in which my name is mentioned but I was not a direct subject of an investigation.

I am a United States citizen. My social security number is:

I am willing to pay fees for this request up to a maximum of $ . If you estimate that the fees will exceed this limit, please inform me first.

Variations of my name that should also be searched include:

The cut-off date after which your record search should begin is my date of birth:
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on ________________________, 2008.

Sincerely,
 

Office of the Attorney General -- Requests for Attorney General records should specify that Attorney General records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of the Deputy Attorney General -- Requests for Deputy Attorney General records should specify that Deputy Attorney General records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of the Associate Attorney General -- Requests for Associate Attorney General records should specify that Associate Attorney General records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives -- Requests for Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives records should be addressed to:
Averill P. Graham
Chief, Disclosure Division
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Department of Justice
Suite 1E360
99 New York Avenue, N.E.
Washington, DC 20226
(202) 648-8740

Civil Division -- Requests for Civil Division records should be addressed to:
James M. Kovakas
Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Officer
Civil Division
Department of Justice
Room 7304, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-3319

Civil Rights Division -- Requests for Civil Rights Division records should be addressed to:
Nelson D. Hermilla, Chief
FOIA/PA Branch
Civil Rights Division
Department of Justice
Room 311, NALC Building
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 514-4209

Community Relations Service -- Requests for Community Relations Service records should be addressed to:
George Henderson
FOIA/PA Coordinator
Community Relations Service
Department of Justice
Suite 6000, 600 E Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 305-2935

Criminal Division -- Requests for Criminal Division records should be addressed to:
Rena Y. Kim
Chief, FOIA/PA Unit
Criminal Division
Department of Justice
Suite 1127, Keeney Building
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 616-0307

Drug Enforcement Administration -- Requests for Drug Enforcement Administration records should be addressed to:
Katherine L. Myrick, Chief
Freedom of Information Operations Unit
FOI/Records Management Section
Drug Enforcement Administration
Department of Justice
West Building, 6th Floor
700 Army Navy Drive
Arlington, VA 22202
(202) 307-7596

Executive Office for United States Attorneys -- Requests for Executive Office of United States Attorneys records should be addressed to:
William G. Stewart, II, Assistant Director
FOIA/Privacy Unit
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Department of Justice
Room 7300, 600 E Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 616-6757

Federal Bureau of Investigation -- Requests for Federal Bureau of Investigation records should be addressed to:
David M. Hardy, Chief
Record/Information Dissemination Section
Records Management Division
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Department of Justice
170 Marcel Drive
Winchester, VA 22602-4843
(540) 868-4591

INTERPOL-United States National Central Bureau -- Requests for INTERPOL-United States National Central Bureau records should be addressed to:
Dorothy S. Beaty
FOIA/PA Specialist
Office of General Counsel
INTERPOL-United States National Central Bureau
Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 616-9000

Justice Management Division -- Requests for Justice Management Division records should be addressed to:
Joan Lapara
FOIA Contact
Justice Management Division
Department of Justice
Room 1111 RFK, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-3101

National Drug Intelligence Center -- Requests for National Drug Intelligence Center records should be addressed to:
FOIA Coordinator
National Drug Intelligence Center
Department of Justice
319 Washington Street
Johnstown, PA 15901-1622
(814) 532-4601

National Security Division -- Requests for National Security Division records should be addressed to:
GayLa D. Sessoms, FOIA Coordinator
National Security Division
Department of Justice
Room 6150, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-5600

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services -- Requests for the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services records should be addressed to:
Gary L. Baude, FOIA Officer
Legal Division
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
Department of Justice
12th Floor, 1100 Vermont Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 353-9864

Office of Information and Privacy -- Requests for Office of Information and Privacy records should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of the Inspector General -- Requests for Office of the Inspector General records should be addressed to:
Deborah Waller, Paralegal Specialist
Office of the Inspector General
Department of Justice
Room 4726
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 616-0646

Office of Intergovernmental and Public Liaison -- Requests for Office of Intergovernmental and Public Liaison records should specify that Intergovernmental and Public Liaison records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of Justice Programs -- Requests for Office of Justice Programs records should be addressed to:
Dorothy Lee, Paralegal Specialist
Office of Justice Programs
Department of Justice
Room 5400, 810 7th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20531
(202) 616-3267

Office of Legal Counsel -- Requests for Office of Legal Counsel records should be addressed to:
Bette Farris, Supervisory Paralegal
Office of Legal Counsel
Department of Justice
Room 5515, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-2038

Office of Legal Policy -- Requests for Office of Legal Policy records should specify that Office of Legal Policy records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of Legislative Affairs -- Requests for Office of Legislative Affairs records should specify that Office of Legislative Affairs records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of Public Affairs -- Requests for Office of Public Affairs records should specify that Office of Public Affairs records are being sought and should be addressed to:
Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information and Privacy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

Office of the Solicitor General -- Requests for Office of the Solicitor General records should be addressed to:
Kaletus L. McCain
Office of the Solicitor General
Department of Justice
Room 6640, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-2203

Tax Division -- Requests for Tax Division records should be addressed to:
Carmen M. Banerjee
Division Counsel for FOIA and PA Matters
Tax Division
Department of Justice
Post Office Box 227
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
(202) 307-6320

United States Marshals Service -- Requests for United States Marshals Service records should be addressed to:
William E. Bordley, Associate General Counsel
Office of General Counsel
United States Marshals Service
Department of Justice
CS-3, 12th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20530-1000
(202) 307-9054

US Air Force
John Espinal
HAF/IMII (FOIA)
1000 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20330-1000
telephone number: (703) 692-9960
fax number: (703) 693-2746
e-mail address: haf.foia@pentagon.af.mil

US Army
Robert Dickerson
Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts Division
Attn: AAHS-RDF
7701 Telegraph Road
Alexandria, VA 22315-3905
telephone number: (703) 428-6504
fax number: (703) 428-6522
e-mail address: DAFOIA@conus.army.mil

Defense Information Systems Agency
Robin M. Berger
Code GC, P.O. Box 4502
Arlington, VA 22204-2199
telephone number: (703) 607-6515
fax number: (703) 607-4344
e-mail address: robin.berger@disa.mil

Defense Intelligence Agency
Alesia Y. Williams
Chief, FOIA Staff, DAN-1A
Washington, D.C. 20340-5100
telephone number: (301) 394-5188
fax number: (301) 394-5356
e-mail address: foia@dia.mil

Defense Logistics Agency
Lewis Oleinick
Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer
Stop 2533
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221
telephone number: (703) 767-6194
fax number: (703) 767-6091

Defense Security Service
Les Blake
Chief, Office of FOIA and Privacy, GCF
1340 Braddock Place
Alexandria, VA 22314-1651
telephone number: (703) 325-5991
fax number: (703) 325-5341
e-mail address: leslie.blake@mail.dss.mil

Defense Technical Information Center
Kelly D. Akers (DTIC-R)
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 0944
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218
telephone number: (703) 767-9194
fax number: (703) 767-9201
e-mail address: foia@dtic.mil

Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Brenda Carter
COSMI (FOIA)
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201
telephone number: (703) 767-1792
fax number: (703) 767-3623
e-mail adress: efoia@dtra.mil

Department of Defense Education Activity
Nancy Ramsay
FOIA Requestor Service Center/PA Office
Office of the Executive Services
4040 North Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22203-1635
telephone number: (703) 588-3200
fax number: (703) 588-3701
e-mail address: FOIA@hq.dodea.edu

US Marine Corps
Teresa (Tracy) D. Ross
FOIA/PA Coordinator
Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps [CMC (ARSF)]
2 Navy Annex
Washington, D.C. 20380-1775
telephone number: (703) 614-4008/3685
fax number: (703) 614-6287
e-mail address: teresa.d.ross@usmc.mil

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Annette Newman
Office of the General Counsel
4600 Sangamore Road (D-10)
Bethesda, MD 20816
telephone number: (301) 227-4744
fax number: (301) 227-2035

National Reconnaissance Office
Information Access and Release Center
14675 Lee Road
Chantilly, VA 20151-1715
telephone number: (703) 227-9128
fax number: (703) 227-9198
e-mail address: foia@nro.mil

National Security Agency
Pamela N. Phillips
Chief, FOIA/PA Office, DJP4
9800 Savage Road, Suite 6248
Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755-6248
telephone number: (301) 688-6527
fax number: (301) 688-4762

US Navy
Miriam Brown-Lam
Head, DON, Privacy Act/FOIA Policy Branch
CNO (DNS-36)
2000 Navy Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20350-2000
telephone number: (202) 685-6545
fax number: (202) 685-6580
e-mail address: foia@mail.navy.mil

Office of the Inspector General
Keith Mastromichalis
Acting Chief, FOIA/PA Office
400 Army Navy Drive, Room 1034
Arlington, VA 22202-2885
telephone number: (703) 604-9775
fax number: (703) 602-0294
e-mail address: foia@dodig.mil

Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff
Will Kammer
OSD/JS FOIA Requester Service Center
Office of Freedom of Information
1155 Defense Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20301-1155
telephone number: (703) 696-4689
toll-free number: (866) 574-4970
fax number: (703) 696-4506

Department of Energy
Kevin Hagerty
Director, FOIA/PA Division, ME-73
1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20585
telephone number: (202) 586-5955
fax number: (202) 586-0575

Department of Health and Human Services
Robert Eckert
Director, FOIA/Privacy Division
Room 5416, Mary E. Switzer Building
330 C Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
telephone number: (202) 690-7453
fax number: (202) 690-8320

Food and Drug Administration
Frederick J. Sadler
Acting Director, FOI Staff
5600 Fishers Lane (HFI-30)
Rockville, MD 20857
telephone number: (301) 827-6567
fax number: (301) 443-1726

National Institutes of Health
Susan R. Cornell
FOIA Officer
Building 31, Room 5B35
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20892
telephone number: (301) 496-5633
fax number: (301) 402-4541

Public Health Service
Darlene Christian
FOIA Officer
Room 17A46
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
telephone number: (301) 443-5252
fax number: (301) 443-0925
e-mail address: dchristian@psc.gov

Department of Homeland Security
Catherine M. Papoi
Deputy Chief FOIA Officer
Director, Disclosure & FOIA
The Privacy Office
245 Murray Drive, S.W.
STOP-0550
Washington, DC 20528-0550
toll-free number: (866) 431-0486
telephone number: (703) 235-0790
fax number: (703) 235-0443
e-mail address: foia@dhs.gov

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Catrina Pavlik-Keenan
800 N. Capitol Street
Fifth Floor, Suite 585
Washington, D.C. 20536
Telephone number: (202) 732-0300
Toll-free number: (866) 633-1182
Fax number: (202) 732-0310

Office of Inspector General
Nikki Gramian
245 Murray Drive, Building 410
Mail Stop 2600
Washington, D.C. 20528-0001
telephone number: (202) 254-4001
fax number: (202) 254-4287

United States Secret Service
Latita M. Huff
Disclosure Officer
Bldg. 410
245 Murray Drive
Washington, D.C. 20223
telephone number: (202) 406-5838
fax number: (202) 406-5154

Transportation Security Administration
Kevin J. Janet
FOIA Officer, TSA-20
601 South 12th Street
Arlington, VA 22202-4220
telephone number: (571) 227-2300
fax number: (571) 227-1406
Department of State
Margaret P. Grafeld

Director, Office of IRM Programs and Services, SA-2
5th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20522-6001
telephone number for inquiries: (202) 261-8484
fax number: (202) 261-8579
Internal Revenue Service
Albert D. Adams
Director, Disclosure
Office of Disclosure
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
telephone number: (202) 927-7425

Department of Veterans Affairs
John Livornese, Director
Records Management Service (005R1B)
810 Vermont Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20420
telephone number: (202) 461-7457
fax number: (202) 273-0443

Federal Agencies

Central Intelligence Agency
Delores Nelson
Information and Privacy Coordinator
Washington, D.C. 20505
telephone number: (703) 613-1287

Commission on Civil Rights
Emma Gonzalez-Joy
FOIA Officer
Room 621
624 9th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20425
telephone number: (202) 376-7700
fax number: (202) 376-1163

Corporation for National Service
Austin Holland
FOIA/PA Officer
1201 New York Avenue, N.W., Room 10606
Washington, D.C. 20525
telephone number: (202) 606-6671
fax number: (202) 606-3467

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board
Seth M. Wood
Deputy Executive Director and Counsel
1724 F Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20502
telephone number: (202) 456-1240
fax number: (202) 456-1066

General Services Administration
Sharon V. Lighton
Administrative Policy Division (ACMA)
Office of Management Services
Room 6001
1800 F Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20405
telephone number: (202) 501-2262
fax number: (202) 501-2727
e-mail address: gsa.foia@gsa.gov

Legal Services Corporation
Patricia Batie
FOIA Officer
3333 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20007
telephone number: (202) 295-1625
fax number: (202) 337-6519
e-mail address: info@smtp.lsc.gov

National Archives and Records Administration
Ramona Oliver
FOIA Officer
Office of the General Counsel
Room 3110
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
telephone number: (301) 837-2024

Office of the Director of National Intelligence
John F. Hackett
Director, Information Management Office
Washington, D.C. 20511
telephone number: (703) 482-1707